• Extremely American

Adriana Albritton: Our Social Atmosphere & the Inception of Covid "Vaccines”


Our Social Atmosphere and The Inception of Covid “Vaccines”


By: Adriana Albritton


December 1, 2021: We all know that SARS-COV-2 brought a lot of devastation globally. Besides bringing death, this virus came along with social isolation, economic recessions, a mental health crisis, social division, vaccines, and mandates. It has been almost two years since life as we knew it has disappeared from our horizon. In this article, we’ll delve into the social atmosphere surrounding COVID, the death rates, virus treatment, and “vaccines.”


Panic and Goal Posts

In the beginning, we were terrified when we heard reports that a virus was killing hundreds overseas. I remember watching the news in disbelief about how “thousands” were dying daily in Italy. Then we heard that the virus was predicted to arrive at our cities anytime. While we were glued to the tv, we were bombarded day and night with death counts, the number of people that were dying due to the virus. According to the media, people were dropping like flies and dying because this coronavirus was extremely contagious, airborne, lived on surfaces for long periods of time, and was lethal.


In the midst of the fear-mongering narrative, we were told that we would return to normal living at some point, but only if we all did our part and complied. Then, local governments imposed lockdowns or mandates to “shelter in place.” Businesses, schools, government agencies, mental health/substance abuse facilities, and places of entertainment were ordered to close while essential businesses (hospitals, supermarkets, and gas stations) were open.


Interestingly enough, liquor stores remained open while places that keep us healthy and sane, such as gyms and places of worship, were shut down. These unprecedented rulings were supposed to be in place for two weeks in order to “flatten the curve.” However, the goal post for lockdowns was moved from two weeks to three months.


Quarantining the vulnerable and symptomatic people made logical sense but quarantining the healthy never did. Up to now, there is no scientific evidence to say that lockdowns save lives.


On the contrary, research shows that among Americans aged 15 to 54, there were over 34,000 excess deaths not attributed to the virus (between March to November 2020). Some of the lockdown-related death factors are increased fatal heart attacks due to failure to prompt treatment, social isolation, drug overdoses, alcohol-related deaths, and suicides. At the same time, lockdowns caused great numbers of unemployment, bankrupted small businesses, and decreased educational levels. Now, we can see how locations with more relaxed lockdowns or refusing to lock faired better. For instance, Sweden’s cumulative death toll per capita from Covid-19 is below the European Union’s average and 20% lower than America’s. Plus, Florida, which reopened early has an excess mortality rate below the national average, much lower than California and New York which had strict lockdowns.

Simultaneously, mandated masking and social distancing in public places became part of the new norm. Just like with lockdowns, there is no scientific evidence in favor of facemasks. Almost two years into the emergence of the virus and our children continue to be forced to wear masks to attend school. And despite all those new regulations, we weren’t permitted to go back to our “normal” lives.


Multiple studies show that long-term mask use poses a serious danger for developing MIES Mask Induced Exhaustion Syndrome (low O2, high CO2, dizziness, exhausted breathing and heartbeat, toxicity, inflammation, increased stress hormone levels, anxiety, anger, headache, slow thinking, drowsiness). Additionally, wearing masks for long periods puts you at risk of bacterial flora’ changes in the mouth resulting in bad breath, tooth decay, inflammation, pneumonia, black fungus, as well as skin and digestive problems, and lowered immune system responses. At the same time, long-term mask use affects children’s development, interactions, and mental health.


Six months after the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic, we were told that normal living would resume upon the development of a vaccine. Vaccine distribution was meant to help those with underlying conditions. However, the goal post was moved once again. Then, we were told that we all should “do our part and get vaccinated”. Recently, President Biden mandated most employees to get vaccinated. If they refuse to comply, their ability to work and provide for their families will be revoked. Vaccine cards have also been implemented so they can be shown at public locations. Those who are not vaccinated can lose their ability to fully participate in society because they’ll be segregated.


The social atmosphere for the past two years has been wearing citizens down. Terror- instilling campaigns, the closure of places of worship and businesses that promote health and entertainment, lockdowns, work prohibition, mandatory masking, social distancing, and forced vaccinations are more detrimental than the virus itself. All these tyrannical measures, I say tyrannical because they violate the constitution, disguised as solutions for our own benefit have done nothing positive for people’s psyche, health, social bonds, or economy.


The stage has been set for what is transpiring. Even if you agree with forced vaccinations, you may be able to see that the imposed draconian measures have created an atmosphere of fear and panic. Did you know that fear can interrupt brain processes? Cognitive processes are affected under uncertainty or catastrophic events. Fear can negatively impact reasoning and behavior, compromising critical thinking and decision-making. This environment is extremely damaging, pushing people to act impulsively and comply blindly. Because, after all, what most citizens of this planet want now is to go back to normal living.


SARS-CoV-2 and Treatments

It’s important to dispel some of the narrative and misinformation that has been circulating around for the past year and a half. It’s important to understand that we have been exposed to fear-mongering crusades. We have been made to believe that SARS-CoV-2 is pretty much lethal, which is why we require a vaccine for our protection.


What if this virus is not as deadly as it has been portrayed?


Dr. Anthony Fauci said that “The seasonal flu has a mortality of 0.1%, whereas the coronavirus is 10 times more lethal, making it about 3%” lethal. Yet, 3% is 30 times greater than 0.1%, not 10 times greater. This is an inaccurate infection fatality rate (IFR) that he propagated, a lie. He, also, projected that there were gonna be 2.2 million deaths due to COVID. As you can see the virus’ fatality rate was overhyped by Fauci and the media.


In fact, SARS-CoV-2 is not deadly for most people. According to the CDC, this virus’ IFR is about 1% for eighty-three percent of the population. Yes, the virus can be extremely damaging to 5 percent of the population but those high-risk individuals are those over age 70, who are not in a healthy state. However, most individuals in society have a survival rate of 99%. On a similar note, healthy children don’t die from this virus, except 0.003% of kids who are immunocompromised.


Studies across 14 countries show that the IFR of COVID-19 is lower than previously reported and slightly lower than CDC’s data. Individuals between 0-19 years of age have an IFR of 0.0027%, those between 20-29 of 0.014%, those between 30-39 of 0.031%, those between 40-49 of 0.082%, those between 50-59 of 0.27%, those between 60-69 years of 0.59%, and people over 70 years of age have an infection fatality rate between 2.4% and 5.5%.


How about the Astronomical Death Rates?

You may have heard stories of younger people who died of this virus. For instance, people in their 30s and 40s who were “healthy and died of COVID.” For one, we do not know if these individuals were really healthy. On the other hand, another factor that has played a part in unnecessary deaths is inappropriate treatment protocols. Here in NYC a lot of people were put into ventilators; they were intubated early on when they didn’t need to be or were left on ventilators longer than necessary, which aggravated their condition. Studies show that early mechanical ventilation is associated with an increased risk of mortality.


Did you know that hospitals had financial incentives to diagnose COVID-positive patients, use ventilators, and certify deaths as COVID-related deaths?


Physicians and medical examiners have reported that hospitals received $13,000 per COVID-19 admission and $39,000 when COVID-positive patients went on a ventilator. Health officials have confirmed that during 2020-2021, people who died from car accidents, heart attacks, suicides, and other causes, and tested positive for COVID-19 were classified as covid-related deaths, even those who were already in hospice and were given a few weeks to live.


Eventually, the CDC corrected their report of 200,000 deaths due to COVID-19 and their numbers showed that 94% of those declared deaths were for patients who tested positive but had other primary causes of death. Thus, true COVID-19 fatalities are actually about 6% of those reported. As you can see, COVID diagnoses and deaths have been overreported.


COVID-19 Treatment

The absence of adequate treatment was another factor playing a part in unnecessary deaths. Besides putting covid-positive patients on ventilators, many patients were given ineffective and unsafe drugs or no treatment at all. Remdesivir is one of the approved drugs with an undesirable health record.


Remdesivir is a costly intravenous drug, pretty much for hospital use. This drug cost Gilead (a Gates foundation company) $10 per dose to manufacture but insurances pay $3,120 per treatment. Remdesivir went through clinical trials in 2016 for Zika, in 2018 for Ebola, and in 2020 in China, showing lethal side effects. In clinical trials, many participants receiving remdesivir developed acute kidney failure, septic shock, and hypotension, 54% of the experimental group died. No wonder why the drug was never approved as safe or effective. Interestingly enough, in October of 2020, the FDA approved remdesivir to treat SARS-CoV-2.

Did you know that Dr. Fauci with NIAID and CDC developed Remdesivir for Gilead, that they hold patents for the drug, and receive royalties for it?


Another factor influencing the death count is that many patients received no treatment at all. Dr. Fauci and other health authorities only inculcated the necessity of lockdowns, mask mandates, and social distancing instead of also advocating health-promoting practices that boost the immune system such as exercise, fresh air, vitamin D, zinc, healthy whole food diets, stress management techniques and the elimination/reduction of alcohol, drugs, cigarettes, sugar, and damaging processed foods.


Due to the lack of treatment guidelines from the health authorities, a few prominent physicians started to use safe repurposed drugs to treat SARS-CoV-2. They used drugs like ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, azithromycin, among others. They got fantastic results, decreasing hospitalizations and reducing mortality in most patients.


However, these drugs started to receive a push back from hospitals, pharmacies, and medical boards because they “were not approved for the treatments of” this particular virus. Despite the fact that they were saving thousands of lives without causing side effects, these drugs received the brunt of smear campaigns. Simultaneously, these doctors received threats, their social media content was censored and deleted, and they were labeled as dissenters from public health recommendations and contributors to COVID-19 misinformation.


Could it be because these inexpensive drugs threatened big pharma and Dr. Fauci’s kickbacks from remdesivir and their patented drugs?


Nevertheless, there are numerous drugs and nutraceuticals proven to be successful at treating SARS-CoV-2. We now have studies comparing the efficacy of different drugs and multitherapy treatment protocols that are highly successful in the treatment of high-risk SARS-CoV-2 infection. Additionally, we have efficacious treatments for Long Haul COVID 19. Presently, we have numerous studies supporting diverse SARS-CoV-2 treatments.


Unfortunately, many of these treatments continue to be suppressed from the public. Could it be that diversity of treatments pose a threat to global vaccination?