May 27, 2021: The bold and unthinkable recent actions of Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko should raise the concerns of all citizens of the world. On May 23, Lukashenko seized an international Ryanair flight to apprehend journalist and opposition activist Raman Pratasevich - this brazen (criminal) action is a clear assault against the international community and the rights of all free men and women. Lukashenko ordered Belarusian jet fighters to divert a Ryanair flight (headed for Vilnius Lithuania) and force an unscheduled landing in Minsk Belarus. Upon seizing the Ryanair jet, Belarusian 'authorities' apprehended Ramen Pratasevich. The event was been followed by 'muted' protests from the international community and its leaders. The disappointing and apathetic response from the international community and political leaders is nothing short of shameful.
A fuller context to this egregious breach of international law is provided by Leonid Bershidsky (who writes for the Chicago Tribune) and is an expert in eastern European and Russian affairs. The Op-ed article provided below is intended to offer expert insights into the tyranny of Lukashenko and should serve as a call-out to the rest of the world to demand more from their political leaders. Failure to effectively address the international transgressions of this Belarusian 'mini-dictator' leaves the door open for far more dangerous actions by other tyrannical leaders who share the same 'profile of tyranny' - Vladimir Putin is an obvious example in this instance.
+ + + + +
Op-ed: Belarus president’s air piracy has no Western precedent
Chicago Tribune - Leonid Bershidsky - May 24, 2021
The double standards defense is the Kremlin’s go-to device whenever it’s accused of wrongdoing: “You Westerners have no moral right to point fingers because you do it too.”
It’s telling that Russia has unfolded the double standards umbrella over Belarusian dictator Alexander Lukashenko, who on Sunday scrambled a fighter jet to land a Ryanair plane in Minsk so he could get his hands on one of the passengers, opposition activist Raman Pratasevich. The list of “precedents” Russia is helpfully citing is an indication that flying over Russian airspace, too, can be extremely risky for opponents of President Vladimir Putin, even if the “precedents” themselves don’t hold water.
Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova named four incidents that, in her view, and thus in official Moscow’s, justify Lukashenko’s action. The first one of these involved the diversion to Vienna of Bolivian President Evo Morales’ plane in July 2013. Returning home from a conference in Moscow, Morales was suspected by U.S. authorities of bringing with him Edward Snowden, the National Security Agency contractor who leaked a trove of highly classified intelligence information; several European countries abruptly refused Morales’ aircraft overflight clearance, in effect forcing it to land in Austria before it ran out of fuel. Snowden, of course, wasn’t on the plane, which may or may not have been searched in Vienna to compound the Bolivian leader’s humiliation.
The parallel appears to make sense to some high-profile commentators — for example, to journalist Glenn Greenwald or to Gregor Gysi, the foreign policy speaker of Germany’s far-left Die Linke party. “Then, too, international law was turned into a travesty,” Gysi tweeted. “So there is no moral authority anymore that can effectively defend international law.” Neither Greenwald nor Gysi is defending Lukashenko’s right to grab Pratasevich, but both are using the occasion to point out that because of the Morales incident, no Western leader can protest it without being a hypocrite.
That’s a shaky argument, and not merely on the basis of aviation rules (to wit, a diplomatic plane like Morales’ must apply for overflight clearance before every flight, unlike a commercial carrier like Ryanair that gets such permissions wholesale). There’s a world of difference between a dissident such as Pratasevich, who has opposed the Lukashenko regime since high school and whose “crime” was to help run an anti-Lukashenko Telegram channel, and a fugitive intelligence service employee with government secrets such as Snowden. It’s true that Snowden’s revelations shed light on highly questionable U.S. practices and there’s no proof that he’s given anything of value directly to Russia aside from a propaganda bonus. But leakers of highly classified information, not to mention those seeking asylum in another country, will almost always be chased by their government, whatever country it runs, a democracy, a tyranny or something in between. That’s just the way the spy game is played.
One can try to ignore the abyss of difference that separates Pratasevich and Snowden, between helping fan protest on a social network and stealing gigabytes of classified information — but erasing it while still being honest with oneself should be an exercise well beyond a reasonable person’s mental powers. To put it simply, pilfering secrets, even for a noble reason, will get one in hot water everywhere, but running an anti-government media outlet is only a crime in repressive societies, in which few proponents of the double standards argument would like to live. (Snowden, too, isn’t in Russia by choice.)
Zakharova’s other examples haven’t resonated as widely because they’re even more problematic. In 2004, the private plane of Russian legislator Andrei Vavilov was forced to land in the U.S. on orders of a California prosecutor so Vavilov could at long last be questioned in a money laundering case. Vavilov was interrogated and allowed to continue on his way. That’s not what awaits Pratasevich in Belarus. He has been forced to record a confessional video that was shown on Belarusian and Russian TV, and a long prison sentence for inciting riots is in the cards for him unless international pressure forces Lukashenko to release him.
In another case Zakharova cited, the Ukrainian authorities in 2012 ordered a regular flight to return to Kyiv (formerly known as Kiev) so they could search and question a passenger, pro-Russian activist Armen Martirosyan — but, like Vavilov, he was allowed to go after a few hours.
The fourth incident also took place in 2012. The Turkish authorities ordered down a Syrian passenger aircraft en route from Moscow to Damascus and confiscated an unspecified, allegedly military cargo. But no one was pulled off the flight in Ankara.
The only thing all the “precedents” have in common is that they involved forced landings. But making the Ryanair flight detour to Minsk was not the worst part of Lukashenko’s move; the reason he did it was to kidnap a dissident whose only weapon had been a computer keyboard. Governments will sometimes divert a plane, and on occasion even scramble jets to do so — an exceptional situation, and potentially a diplomatic scandal. But the threat to the life and liberty of 26-year-old journalist Pratasevich, a major figure in last year’s overwhelmingly peaceful protests against Lukashenko’s stealing of an election, is what makes the incident stand out.
Lukashenko’s violent crackdown on the protests appears to have pushed Putin down the same road of suppression that rules out any dialogue with opponents. Russia’s support for Pratasevich’s arrest and its juggling of “precedents” that few will bother to scrutinize amount to a warning: What Lukashenko has done, Putin may do in the near future. “Whataboutism” can be justified in some cases, and Western politicians cannot always claim a moral high ground — but in this particular case, the double standards narrative is a transparent rhetorical device used to dress up a threat. Any Belarusian or Russian who has dared to fight the regime — if only with a pen, not a sword — can be subject to what befell Pratasevich. Adjust travel plans accordingly.